What happens if the Medical Review Officer finds no valid reason for the member's inability to produce a sufficient sample?

When a Medical Review Officer (MRO) finds no valid reason for a member's inability to produce a sufficient sample, the conclusion drawn is that the situation is treated as though the member has tested positive. This process is rooted in policies designed to ensure the integrity and reliability of drug testing within the workforce.

By treating the lack of a sufficient sample as a positive test, the organization emphasizes the importance of compliance with drug testing procedures. This serves as a deterrent against potential misuse of the system. It also reflects that the member’s inability to provide a sample raises concerns about their involvement with substances, warranting disciplinary action comparable to that which would follow an actual positive test result.

In contrast, retesting, whether on the next day or during their next tour, doesn't address the need for accountability regarding the initial failure to produce a sample. Referring the member for a third-party evaluation could be seen as more lenient and may provide an opportunity for justification of the situation, which contradicts the strict procedures meant to maintain the standard. The policy’s strict stance reinforces the commitment to safety and responsibility in the workplace.